Maintenance Therapy Research Articles

Long-term survival after systemic chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and maintenance therapy for an older adult patient with recurrent pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma.

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare cancer with no specific treatment. The treatment and chemotherapy for PACC are selected according to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Herein, we describe a recurrent PACC case of an older adult patient. The patient was treated with systemic chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and maintenance therapy based on the pathologic germline BRCA2 variant, resulting in long-term survival. The pathogenic BRCA variant is detected more frequently in patients with PACC than in those with PDAC. The BRCA variant significantly impacts treatment selection and prognosis; therefore, early genomic analysis is recommended when treating PACC.

Olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer at a single institution: A retrospective study.

In this study, we aimed to investigate patient characteristics, efficacy, prognostic factors, and safety of olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer at our institution. Patients responding to platinum-based therapy and starting olaparib maintenance therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer at Kurume University Hospital between January 2018 and November 2021 were enrolled in the study. Their data were extracted retrospectively from medical records. In all, 50 patients were included. The median (range) age of the patients, follow-up time, and duration of olaparib maintenance therapy were 62 (39-87) years, 21.6 (2.2-45.9) months, and 7.2 (2-45.9) months, respectively. Among the 29 patients tested for homologous recombination (HR) status, 22 (75.9%) were positive for HR deficiency (HRD), 12 (54.5%) of whom had BRCA-positive tumors. The median progression-free survival was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval: 6.2-12.6), and the median overall survival was 27.1 months (95% confidence interval: 22.5-40.3). Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that HRD was an independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival. The most common adverse event was nausea (any grade, n = 30, 60%), resulting in drug interruption (n = 23, 46%), dose reduction (n = 17, 34%), and discontinuation of treatment (n = 1, 2%). Olaparib maintenance therapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer at our institution was effective, with acceptable adverse events. HRD was the most significant prognostic factor for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Efficacy and safety of niraparib in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital.

Niraparib has been authorized for maintenance treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer after first-line treatment with platinum, in partial or complete response. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of maintenance niraparib in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) patients in a tertiary hospital. This retrospective observational unicentre study included women diagnosed with ovarian adenocarcinoma who received niraparib. Eligibility criteria encompassed women with PSROC, in response to platinum chemotherapy, and not previously treated with other PARPis. Data on demographics, comorbidities, BRCA mutation status, disease stage, treatment history and adverse events were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 33 patients were included, with a median age of 63.5 years. The majority of patients received niraparib at 200 mg/day based on Research on Adverse Drug Events and Report criteria. Median OS was 30 months (95% CI: 16.76-43.23), and median PFS was 8 months (95% CI: 2.48-13.52). Adverse effects were more frequent during the initial months of treatment, with most classified as CTCAE v5 grade 1-2. Dose reductions, interruption of treatment and discontinuations were observed due to haematologic toxicities primarily. This real-world study showed that maintenance niraparib in PSROC patients had effectiveness and safety profiles consistent with clinical trials and other observational studies. Median PFS and OS were comparable to previous reports, and most adverse events were manageable with dose modifications. The results support the use of niraparib as a maintenance therapy option in this patient population.

Familial and hereditary pancreatic cancer in Japan.

As in Western countries, familial pancreatic cancer accounts for 5-7% of pancreatic cancer (PC) in Japan. Opportunities for diagnosing hereditary pancreatic cancer (HPC) are increasing owing to the coverage of companion diagnostics and cancer genomic profiling by national health insurance in patients with unresectable or recurrent PC refractory to standard chemotherapies. HPC is recognized in 7% of PCs and 15% of familial pancreatic cancer, including germline variants of BRCA1/2, ATM, PALB2, APC, and mismatch repair genes. Individuals with 5-fold or greater inherited risks of PC are recommended to undergo pancreatic surveillance according to Japanese guidelines. The imaging modalities for this surveillance include endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, abdominal ultrasound, and enhanced computed tomography. Currently, a nationwide prospective surveillance study is ongoing in Japan. Platinum-based chemotherapy is an effective pancreatic cancer treatment in patients with variants of homologous recombination repair genes (BRCA1/2 and PALB2); however, the use of platinum regimens solely based on familial/personal cancer history remains controversial. The efficacy of olaparib maintenance therapy, as confirmed by the POLO study, has significantly impacted the clinical treatment of advanced PC patients in Japan. Since the initiation of precision cancer medicine in 2019, genetic medicine for PC patients has expanded in Japan.

Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that had not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy in France. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. Data from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432) were used to inform estimates of clinical and utility values considering a 10-year time horizon and a weekly cycle length. Cost data were estimated from a collective perspective and included treatment acquisition, administration, follow-up, adverse event-related hospitalization, transport, post-progression, and end-of-life costs. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years gained. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to compare cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay in France. Uncertainty was assessed using a range of sensitivity analyses. Avelumab plus BSC was associated with a gain of 2.49 QALYs and total discounted costs of €136,917; BSC alone was associated with 1.82 QALYs and €39,751. Although avelumab plus BSC was associated with increased acquisition costs compared with BSC alone, offsets of -€20,424 and -€351 were observed for post-progression and end-of-life costs, respectively. The base case analysis ICER was €145,626/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the reference case and showed that efficacy parameters (overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation), post-progression time on immunotherapy, and post-progression costs had the largest impact on the ICER. This analysis demonstrated that avelumab plus BSC is associated with a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for patients with la/mUC who are eligible for 1L maintenance therapy in France.

Chronic radiation proctitis refractory to steroid enema was successfully treated by metformin and sodium butyrate: a case report

BackgroundRadiation proctitis (RP) is a significant complication of pelvic radiation. Effective treatments for chronic RP are currently lacking. We report a case where chronic RP was successfully managed by metformin and butyrate (M-B) enema and suppository therapy.Case presentationA 70-year-old Asian male was diagnosed with prostate cancer of bilateral lobes, underwent definitive radiotherapy to the prostate of 76 Gy in 38 fractions and six months of androgen deprivation therapy. Despite a stable PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL for 10 months post-radiotherapy, he developed intermittent rectal bleeding, and was diagnosed as chronic RP. Symptoms persisted despite two months of oral mesalamine, mesalamine enema and hydrocortisone enema treatment. Transition to daily 2% metformin and butyrate (M-B) enema for one week led to significant improvement, followed by maintenance therapy with daily 2.0% M-B suppository for three weeks, resulting in continued reduction of rectal bleeding. Endoscopic examination and biopsy demonstrated a good therapeutic effect.ConclusionsM-B enema and suppository may be an effective treatment for chronic RP.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rozanolixizumab in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a randomised, subject-blind, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial and open-label extension study

BackgroundChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a peripheral nerve disorder characterised by weakness and sensory loss. We assessed the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor rozanolixizumab for CIDP management.MethodsCIDP01 (NCT03861481) was a...

Prolonged remission with ibrutinib maintenance therapy following radiation in a patient with relapsed primary CNS lymphoma.

Background: Treatment for refractory or relapsed primary CNS lymphoma (r/r PCNSL) is challenging. Salvage whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is an option but has a short duration of disease control, so additional treatment modalities are warranted. Case: A 75-year-old female with r/r PCNSL who had multipleprogressions after multiple lines of treatment underwent salvage WBRT. The patient received ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy for 18months following WBRT with the intention of increasing survival duration after salvage WBRT. She survived 81months from diagnosis, including 57months after completion of WBRT. Conclusion: Thiscase presentation describes the experience ofusing ibrutinib as maintenance therapy in treating r/r PCNSL after salvage WBRT.

Infliximab (Remsima SC)

We recommend that Remsima SC be reimbursed by public drug plans as maintenance treatment for adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) whose disease has had an inadequate response, or who were intolerant, to conventional therapy if certain conditions are met. Remsima SC maintenance treatment should only be covered to treat adults with moderately to severely active UC whose disease has had an inadequate response, or who are intolerant, to conventional therapy. Patients are required to achieve a clinical response to induction therapy with infliximab IV at week 10 of treatment to continue with Remsima SC as maintenance therapy. Remsima SC should only be reimbursed if prescribed by a physician experienced in diagnosing and managing UC and should not be reimbursed if used in combination with other advanced therapies for UC. The cost of Remsima SC should not exceed the drug program cost of treatment with the least costly biologic therapy reimbursed for the treatment of UC.

Infliximab (Remsima SC)

We recommend that Remsima SC be reimbursed by public drug plans as maintenance treatment for adults with moderately to severely active Crohn disease (CD) whose disease has had an inadequate response, or who were intolerant to, conventional therapy if certain conditions are met. Remsima SC maintenance treatment should only be covered to treat adults with moderately to severely active CD whose disease had an inadequate response, or who are intolerant, to conventional therapy. Patients are required to achieve a clinical response to induction therapy with infliximab IV at week 10 of treatment to continue with Remsima SC as maintenance therapy. Remsima SC should only be reimbursed if prescribed by a physician experienced in diagnosing and managing CD and should not be combined with a biologic or Janus kinase (JAK inhibitor) treatment for CD. The cost of Remsima SC should not exceed the drug program cost of treatment with the least costly biologic therapy reimbursed for the treatment of CD.

J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan.

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival. In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7). Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.

Efficacy of Shenglin decoction in preventing acute severe lymphocytopenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundDefinitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by maintenance therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the best chance of cure for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A significant challenge in this regimen is the occurrence of acute severe lymphopenia (ASL), which can compromise treatment efficacy. Currently, there are no effective strategies for preventing and treating ASL. Shenglin decoction (SLD), a traditional Chinese herbal medicine formulation, has demonstrated preliminary efficacy in mitigating ASL. However, robust evidence from clinical trials and a clear understanding of its mechanism of action are still needed. This study aims to comprehensively assess the efficacy, safety, and underlying mechanisms of SLD in the prevention of ASL.MethodsThis prospective, dual-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial will enroll 140 stage III NSCLC patients. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to a control group or an experimental group. Both groups will undergo definitive CCRT. Alongside the commencement of CCRT, the experimental group will receive an additional oral SLD intervention for a duration of three months. The primary outcome is the incidence rate of ASL, defined as the proportion of patients who experience at least one instance of a total lymphocyte count falling below 0.5 × 10^9 cells/L within 3 months of initiating CCRT treatment. Additionally, 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis of fecal samples to assess gut microbiota, as well as metabolomic analysis of fecal/blood samples, will be conducted to explore potential mechanisms.DiscussionThis study protocol aims to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and safety of SLD, as well as elucidate its mechanism of action in preventing ASL. Successful outcomes could establish SLD as an evidence-based intervention for ASL prevention in NSCLC patients undergoing CCRT.Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300071788, https://www.chictr.org.cn/).

Mass Spectrometry-Based Assessment of M protein in Peripheral Blood During Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Mass spectrometry (MS) can detect multiple myeloma-derived monoclonal proteins in peripheral blood (PB) with high sensitivity, potentially serving as a PB assay for measurable residual disease (MRD). This study evaluated the significance of PB MS MRD negativity during post-transplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Serum samples from 138 patients treated in the phase 3 ATLAS trial of post-transplant maintenance with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone were analyzed using EXENT MS methodology. We established feasibility of measuring MRD by MS in PB in the post-transplant setting, despite unavailability of pre-treatment calibration samples. There was high agreement between MRD by MS in PB and paired BM MRD results at the 10-5 threshold, assessed by either next generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (70% and 67%, respectively). Agreement between PB MS and both BM MRD methods was lowest early after transplant and increased with time. MS negativity was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), which in landmark analysis reached statistical significance after 18 cycles post-transplant. Combined PB/BM MRD negativity by MFC or NGS was associated with superior PFS compared to MRD negativity by only one modality. Sustained MS negativity carried similar prognostic performance to sustained BM MRD negativity at the 10-5 threshold. Overall, post-transplant MS assessment was feasible and provided additional prognostic information to BM MRD negativity. Further studies are needed to confirm the role and optimal timing of MS in disease evaluation algorithms. The ATLAS trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02659293.

Comparing the Efficacy of Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) Treatment in COPD Patients Based on Blood Eosinophilia: A Clinical Trial Study

Background: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) have been widely used in the maintenance therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Eosinophilic airway inflammation is a recognized inflammatory endotype in COPD. Nevertheless, the benefits and risks of ICS treatment remain controversial. Objectives: Therefore, in this study, we determine the frequency of eosinophilia in COPD patients and compare the effects of ICSs in patients with and without eosinophilia referring to the lung clinics of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Methods: In this study, 58 COPD patients were examined. Peripheral blood smears (PBS) were collected from all patients, and they were randomly divided into 2 groups. First, a 6-minute walking test (6MWT) was performed on all patients. Thereafter, two groups of patients received standard treatment with the Symbicort spray for 3 months. They were followed for this period, and the 6MWT was performed again at the end of the 3 months. Results: The mean results of the 6MWT test before and after intervention in the eosinophilia-positive group were 164.02 meters and 192.11 meters, respectively. Therefore, there was a significant difference in patient activity levels before and after ICSs (P = 0.017). In the eosinophilia-negative group, there was a significant difference in patient activity levels based on the 6MWT test before and after taking ICSs (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in activity levels between the two groups before and after the intervention (P = 0.68 and P = 0.36). Conclusions: Our finding showed that treatment with inhaled β2-agonists plus corticosteroids did not affect the response to this treatment in subjects' groups with and without eosinophilia compared to the pre-treatment conditions.

Niraparib maintenance therapy using an individualised starting dose in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (NORA): final overall survival analysis of a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Niraparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), regardless of germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm) status, in NORA. This analysis reports final data on overall survival (OS). This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled patients across 30 centres in China between 26 September 2017 and 2 February 2019 (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03705156). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, recurrent, (predominantly) high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (no histological restrictions for those with gBRCAm) and had received ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive niraparib or placebo, with stratification by gBRCAm status, time to recurrence following penultimate platinum-based chemotherapy, and response to last platinum-based chemotherapy. Following a protocol amendment, the starting dose was individualised: 200mg/day for patients with bodyweight <77kg and/or platelet count <150×103/μL at baseline and 300mg/day otherwise. OS was a secondary endpoint. Totally, 265 patients were randomised to receive niraparib (n=177) or placebo (n=88), and 249 (94.0%) received an individualised starting dose. As of 14 August 2023, median follow-up for OS was 57.9 months (IQR, 54.8-61.6). Median OS (95% CI) with niraparib versus placebo was 51.5 (41.4-58.9) versus 47.6 (33.3-not evaluable [NE]) months, with hazard ratio [HR] of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.60-1.23), in the overall population; 56.0 (36.1-NE) versus 47.6 (31.6-NE) months, with HR of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.46-1.58), in patients with gBRCAm; and 46.5 (41.0-NE) versus 46.9 (31.8-NE) months, with HR of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.56-1.35), in those without. No new safety signals were identified, and myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukaemia occurred in three (1.7%) niraparib-treated patients. Niraparib maintenance therapy with an individualised starting dose demonstrated a favourable OS trend versus placebo in PSROC patients, regardless of gBRCAm status. Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd; National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for "Significant New Drugs Development" in 2018, China [grant number 2018ZX09736019].

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: study protocol for cohort C of the open-label, phase 2, randomized controlled multicenter OPAL trial

BackgroundMaintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib’s efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination–deficient tumors.MethodsOPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination–deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre–interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1.DiscussionOPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.

The evolving treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial cancer.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, up to 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin, necessitating alternative treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective in cisplatin-ineligible patients. However, despite advances in the first-line setting, the prognosis remains poor, and challenges persist in selecting optimal therapies, treatment sequences and combination regimens. Maintenance therapy with avelumab revealed improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with best supportive care alone in patients with platinum-responsive mUC. Antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapy with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown promise in selected patients, particularly in patients with metastatic disease that has progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy. At the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress in 2023, groundbreaking results were presented from two phase III trials, EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 and CheckMate 901, focusing on previously untreated mUC. In the former, the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab showed significant improvements in OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone; the combination of nivolumab with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy demonstrated a significant extension in median OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone. Inaddition, erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer OS than chemotherapy among patients with mUC and FGFR alterations after previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This comprehensive summary of the current treatment landscape for mUC incorporates clinical trial evidence and discussion of agents that are currently under investigation to provide support for clinical decision making and understanding of future therapeutic approaches.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis : Aretrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches in 463patients].

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is amultifactorial inflammatory disease, the treatment of which has undergone significant changes in recent years. In addition to surgical approaches, topical and systemic steroids, and adaptive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization, three specific antibodies have complemented the therapeutic portfolio since 2019. Aretrospective evaluation of all patients who presented as outpatients for the first time due to CRSwNP in 2007 and 2008 (collectiveA) and 2017 and 2018 (collectiveB) was performed, up to and including June 2023. The clinical courses of 463patients (mean age 49.1years, range 5-82years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. Conservative treatment with nasal corticosteroids started before initial presentation was more frequent in collectiveB (collectiveA 43.9% vs. collectiveB 72.2%). In 278 of the 463 patients (60%; A:62%, B:58%), at least one operation on the nasal sinuses had been performed after initial presentation; in 101 of these patients (36.3%) recurrent polyposis (within mean follow-up of 2.4years) required further treatment. The indication for ASA provocation/desensitization was applied less frequently in collectiveB, also due to ahigh discontinuation rate (at least 38%) of the maintenance therapy. Of the total cohort, 16patients (3.5%; A:n = 8, B:n = 8) were meanwhile switched to antibody therapy at recurrence. Astep-by-step guideline-orientated approach is recommended in the treatment of CRSwNP. Systemic antibodies as an add-on to nasal corticosteroids are arelatively new therapeutic option for treatment-refractory CRSwNP, which reduces the indication for ASA desensitization, which is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects and poor compliance.

A comparative analysis of kidney allograft outcomes in steroid use versus steroid discontinuation after basiliximab and ATG induction: AUNOS database study.

The relative safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant patients after basiliximab compared to anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy is unknown. We aimed to compare kidney allograft outcomes in steroid use versus steroid discontinuation after basiliximab and ATG induction from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of the UNOS database and included first kidney transplant recipients who received ATG or basiliximab induction therapy. We compared graft and patient outcomes in those who received steroid maintenance and those who were discharged off steroids. Of 106,061 patients, 25,344 (86.7%) received basiliximab induction and were maintained on steroids (B-Sm), and 3,880 (13.3%) were on a steroid-free regimen (B-Sf). Graft failure rate was significantly higher in the B-Sf compared to B-Sm at 1-year (4.1 vs. 1.8%, p<0.001), 3-year (6.0 vs. 4.3%, p<0.001) and 5-year follow-up (7.7 vs. 6.4%, p=0.0004). The mortality rate was significantly higher in B-Sf at 1-year (3.3 vs. 2.4%, p=0.0005), 3-year (7.6 vs. 5.5%, p<0.001) and 5-year follow-up (11.5 vs. 8.8%, p<0.001) when compared to the B-Sm. 76,837 recipients received ATG induction therapy, 51,745 (72.4%) were on steroid maintenance therapy (A-Sm) and 25,092 (32.6%) were on a steroid-free regimen (A-Sf). The graft failure rate was significantly higher in A-Sf compared to A-Sm at 1-year follow-up (2.6 vs. 2.3%, p=0.0006), however, there was no difference at 3-year (5.0 vs. 5.0%, p=0.53) or 5-year follow-up (7.2 vs. 8.1%, p=0.17). There was no difference in mortality rates between A-Sf vs. A-Sm at 1 year (2.5 vs. 2.4%, p=0.98) and at 3 years (5.5 vs. 5.4%, p=0.45), respectively. Patients who were maintained on steroids after basiliximab induction had better 5-year allograft survival and patient survival compared to those who were not maintained on steroids. However, steroid maintenance conferred no additional benefit after ATG induction and was associated with higher mortality.

Identification of relapse predictors of IgG&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;-related sclerosing cholangitis

Introduction. Relapses occur in 30–50% of patients IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. Relapses may act an independent risk factor for malignancy development and the need in maintenance therapy for relapse prevention is still uncertain. Thus, studying relapse predictors and developing reliable preventive approaches is an important area of research for this condition.Aim. To determine relapse predictors of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis.Materials and methods. A single- center dynamic bidirectional observational study was conducted in patients aged 18 years and older with verified IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (n = 32). We searched for possible factors influencing the relapse of IgG4- related sclerosing cholangitis. The development of a prognostic model for the relapse probability was carried out using logistic regression. ROC analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative variables in predicting of relapse.Results. The median follow-up period was 33 (16–60) months. The majority of patients with IgG4-related sclerosing cholan- gitis were male (71.9%), median age was 59 ± 13 years. In most patients, delayed diagnosis (median 10.5 [4.8; 22.5] months) was associated with overdiagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis (41.2%) or bile duct malignancy (43.8%). Surgical interventions were performed in 50% of patients. Median serum IgG4 level was 2.70 g/L [1.92; 6.48], and 21.9% of patients had normal serum IgG4 level. Disease relapse developed in 34.4% (n = 11) of patients. Serum IgG4 level before glucocorticosteroid therapy ≥ 2.24 g/L and a delay in diagnosis by ≥ 17 months were associated with the relapse (p = 0.040 and p = 0.049 respectively). Multi-organ involvement, and extrahepatic localization of biliary strictures in the patients with the history of surgical interventions increased the risk of relapse 85 (p = 0.001) and 12 (p = 0.047) fold, respectively. The presence of biliary strictures below the confluence reduced the risk of relapse 7.5 fold (p = 0.032).Conclusions. Possible predictors of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis relapse may include multi- organ involvement, intrahepatic and proximal extrahepatic strictures, prior surgical interventions in patients with extrahepatic strictures, high serum IgG4 level, and delayed diagnosis.